Sue Grey’s report has triggered a contemporary wave of fury amongst officers in Whitehall, outraged on the lack of punishment for senior civil servants.
A number of officers advised The Unbiased that Ms Grey’s lack of suggestions for disciplinary actions has left them unable to scrub up the civil service’s status.
“Simon, Martin, Helen and others have introduced the service into disrepute,” a senior Whitehall supply mentioned.
Simon Case, the UK’s most senior official, attended gatherings close to his workplace and the party for which the chancellor Rishi Sunak and prime minister Boris Johnson had been each fined. He didn’t obtain a high-quality from the police.
Martin Reynolds, on the time Mr Johnson’s most senior aide, despatched messages with a view to organise a BYOB drinks occasion within the Downing Road backyard in Could 2020. He then despatched a message saying the occasion was one thing “we appear to have obtained away with”.
Helen MacNamara, the then deputy cupboard secretary, arrange a karaoke machine at a celebration within the cupboard workplace, Ms Grey’s report mentioned.
“We are supposed to information extra junior workers away from conditions the place they blur traces with political advisers and poor behaviour,” officers mentioned. “Their actions basically led others to assume, ‘dive in’”, they added, noting that morale was already bruised by studies of job cuts.
As probably the most senior civil servant within the UK, Mr Case is in the end answerable for the conduct of officers, significantly these within the cupboard workplace.
Ms Grey’s report mentioned: “Many shall be dismayed that behaviour of this type passed off on this scale on the coronary heart of presidency.”
“The senior management on the centre, each political and official, should bear accountability for this tradition,” it added.
Nevertheless, a message despatched to civil servants by Mr Case and Alex Chisholm, chief working officer for the civil service, following publication of the report didn’t provide any apology to workers for what Ms Grey termed “failings”.
The fury the message and Ms Grey’s report provoked was not restricted to London or “the bubble of Whitehall”, one senior civil servant based mostly in Northern Eire mentioned.
They famous that they regard their Whitehall colleagues as having “further accountability” to “set an instance” to satellite tv for pc places of work up and down the UK and in UK authorities websites abroad. They mentioned that they “really feel very let down”.
One other quipped that workers appeared to have spent their whole “London weighting” on booze, in reference to the extra wage awarded to officers within the capital with a view to meet greater residing prices, and that they must have it revoked.
“I need individuals to know that this isn’t how all civil servants had been behaving throughout lockdowns. Many people have households with well being issues, our personal causes to protect, or took dangers at work solely, strictly, the place we needed to with a view to preserve issues operating,” the official based mostly in Northern Eire mentioned.
The prime minister mentioned he took “full accountability” for the law-breaking occasions, which he bitterly regretted.
Ms Grey mentioned she remained “immensely proud” to be a civil servant.
A authorities spokesperson mentioned: “Following the completion of the Metropolitan Police Service investigation and publication of Sue Grey’s report, all allegations of misconduct by civil servants and particular advisers shall be pursued in keeping with present insurance policies.
“Following the long-standing apply of successive administrations, any particular HR motion in opposition to people will stay confidential.”